Making a roof insurance claim in Villa Park

What follows is how the process actually runs, in the order it runs in. It is not advice about your policy — nobody can give you that without reading it — and it is not a promise about any outcome. It is the map.

In Villa Park the failure that leads is the autumn offshore winds, which find anything already loose, and that shapes what a claim here usually looks like. These winds are not constant, which is the problem. A roof gets nine quiet months and then one night at fifty miles an hour, and whatever was marginal goes. The radar record for this area is on the storm page, with the dates — worth having in front of you, because the date of the event is the first thing an insurer asks for.

How a claim actually runs

The process is: loss, evidence, mitigation, notice, inspection, scope, payment, work, final payment. Insurers are used to it and run it many times a day; the homeowner is doing it for the first and probably only time, and that asymmetry is the real difficulty rather than any individual step being hard.

It helps to think of it as a file being built rather than a decision being made. Everything you send becomes part of the file, and the file is what gets decided on — not the roof.

Evidence, before anything else

Photograph before you touch anything. Wide shots that establish the whole house and locate the damage on it; close shots of each damaged area; photographs of undamaged areas of the same roof for comparison, which is the one people skip and the one that most helps you; and the interior, including ceilings, walls and the attic. Then photograph the temporary repairs after they are done, so there is a clear record of what was storm damage and what was mitigation.

An adjuster can work with photographs. They cannot work with a description, and they will not take your word for what was there before the tarp went on.

What to have ready:

• The contractor’s written assessment, if you have had one done
• A dated written note of what happened, when, and who you spoke to
• Any paperwork from when the roof was last replaced or repaired
• Dated photographs taken before anything was moved, cleared or covered
• Photographs of undamaged sections of the same roof, for comparison
• Receipts for tarps, emergency call-outs and anything else spent making it safe

Mitigation: the step that is required of you

Mitigation is not repair, and the distinction matters. Making the roof watertight for a fortnight is mitigation and should be documented as such. Beginning the permanent repair before the adjuster has seen the damage is not mitigation, and it removes the evidence the claim depends on. If circumstances force a permanent repair immediately, photograph everything exhaustively first and tell the insurer why it could not wait.

Keep any material that was removed if it is practical to do so — a bundle of damaged shingles in the garage has settled more than one disagreement about what the roof was like.

The inspection, from the adjuster’s side

They will typically mark out a test square — often ten feet by ten feet — on each slope and count the impacts inside it, because a count per square is how the trade decides whether a slope is damaged enough to warrant replacing rather than repairing. They will check the gutters, the vents, the flashing, the ridge and the soft metal, and they will look at the slopes the weather did not reach as a control.

They are also assessing whether the roof was in serviceable condition beforehand. Missing shingles from an earlier storm that was never claimed, obvious prior patching, or a roof visibly at the end of its life all weaken a claim, because they make it harder to attribute the damage to one dated event.

Two settlement bases, and the difference is most of the cheque

On a replacement cost policy the payment normally arrives in two parts, and this surprises almost everybody. The first cheque is the actual cash value: the full repair cost, less depreciation, less your deductible. The remainder — the "recoverable depreciation" — is released only after the work is actually finished and you have submitted an invoice proving it. It is not a reduction in what you are owed. It is money being held until the roof exists.

Two consequences follow. First, the first cheque will look far too small, and that is normal rather than a denial. Second, if you never do the work, you never receive the second half — so taking the first payment and living with the damaged roof means accepting the depreciated figure permanently.

The deductible, and the thing no honest contractor will offer

Two numbers matter and both are on the declarations page: the standard deductible, and the wind-and-hail deductible if the policy has a separate one. Percentage deductibles are the ones that catch people out, because a percentage of the dwelling coverage is a much larger number than a percentage of the claim.

And one rule with no exceptions attached to it: the deductible gets paid, by you, to the contractor, and it appears on the invoice. Any arrangement that makes it vanish is fraud — not a grey area, not aggressive negotiation, not a discount. Walk away from anyone who offers it, and understand that a contractor willing to defraud an insurer in front of you has told you exactly how they will treat your roof.

The things that turn a claim into a criminal matter

The straightforward test: does every document the insurer receives describe what actually happened and what was actually paid? If the answer is yes, everything is fine, including being firm and well-documented about a claim you believe is being underpaid. Pressing hard for a fair settlement is legitimate. Misdescribing the loss is not, and the difference is not a matter of degree.

There is nothing wrong with getting the most your policy actually provides. There is a great deal wrong with getting more than it provides, and the gap between those two is the entire subject.

Partial or full: where claims actually get stuck

A partial approval is not a denial, and it is not final either. If your contractor’s scope and the adjuster’s scope differ, the route forward is a written, itemised comparison of the two — line by line, with photographs attached to the lines that differ — sent to the insurer with a request for re-inspection. Insurers revise scopes routinely when given something specific to revise against. They revise nothing in response to a phone call expressing dissatisfaction.

Ask the contractor for their scope in the same format the insurer uses, item by item with quantities. Two documents in the same shape can be compared. A quote that is one number and a paragraph cannot be.

What to find out first

Find out three numbers before you file: your deductible, your wind-and-hail deductible if you have a separate one, and whether the policy settles on replacement cost or actual cash value. Then get an independent written assessment of the damage. If the damage is plainly below the applicable deductible, filing gains you nothing and still records a claim.

Claims history affects renewal pricing and, in some markets, whether you are renewed at all. That is not a reason to avoid a legitimate claim on real damage — it is a reason to know the size of the damage before deciding.

How long all of this takes

A straightforward claim, uncontested, typically runs a few weeks from report to first payment, then however long the roofing work takes to schedule, then a further wait for the depreciation to be released after the invoice goes in. A contested one runs months. The variable is almost never the roof; it is how many rounds of scope disagreement there are.

Roofing capacity is the other timing factor and it is entirely local. After a widespread event every crew in the area is booked, and the gap between an approved claim and an available crew can be longer than the claim took.

If the claim is denied

A denial has to be in writing and it has to give reasons, usually citing the specific policy provision relied on. That letter is the most useful thing in the file, because it tells you exactly what has to be answered. Read it against your policy and identify which of three things has happened: the insurer does not accept the damage exists, does not accept the cause is covered, or does not accept the amount.

Those are three different problems with three different answers, and treating a denial as one undifferentiated "no" is why so many are never successfully challenged.

What it comes down to

The homeowners who do best out of claims are not the ones with the worst damage or the loudest voices. They are the ones with dated photographs, a written scope, and a contractor who turned up to the inspection.